Key Performance Indicators to criteria 17

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-3: Investment agreements subject to human rights screenings
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening.

b. The definition used for ‘significant investment agreements’.

a. 100% according to the consent to the HOCHTIEF Code of Conduct: a) HOCHTIEF Code of Conduct (internal/own employees) and b) HOCHTIEF Code of Conduct for contractual partners (external)

b. In general, HOCHTIEF contracts are always based on the HOCHTIEF Code of Conduct and the HOCHTIEF Code of Conduct for contractual partners, respectively. 

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-1: Operations subject to human rights reviews
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments, by country.

HOCHTIEF has deployed a human rights quick check in project audits by the internal audit function since 2017. 

- Via a risk analysis project on construction sites in Western Europe (Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Greece) in 2019, an evaluation for 9,74% of the Group employees was conducted.

- In 2018, CIMIC conducted a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) across the mining operations in Indonesia. In 2017, a comoarable assessment was conducted for activites in India. Thus, the assessments cover more than 38% of CIMIC staff. 

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-1: New suppliers subject to social screening
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria.

97%
In each of our three divisions, we have established a prequalification process. When assessing potential contractual partners, we include information from supplier self-assessments as well as internal and external data (such as from rating agencies). By way of this process, new contractual partners are required to provide proof that their products and services meet our economic, ecological, and social requirements.

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-2: Social impacts in the supply chain
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts.

b. Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts.

c. Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain.

d. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment.

e. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

a. We have proactively conducted an assessment of potential human rights issues in the last 3 years. 1.99% of around 61.245 contractors and Tier 1 suppliers were assessed. 
b. Der total amount of parnters in the evaluation was 352. 
c. 28.83 % of total assessed where general risks (human rights) have been identified.
d. 100%
e. cf. d