Key Performance Indicators to criteria 17

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-3: Investment agreements subject to human rights screenings
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening.

b. The definition used for ‘significant investment agreements’.

a. Zero (0%) significant investment agreements and contracts include human rights clauses or underwent human rights screening.

b.
Anhalt does not operate in high-risk countries and does also not invest in such. Thus, it can not be reported on this instant and no definition can be given for "significant investment agreements".

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-1: Operations subject to human rights reviews
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments, by country.

a. Zero (0%) operations have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments. We only operate in Germany and throughout Europe.

All locations of the company are located in Germany and not in high-risk countries. Annually, it is checked by means of a DIN ISO 26000 checklist that all human rights are adhered to.

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-1: New suppliers subject to social screening
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria.

Our suppliers are only located in Germany and Europe - not in high-risk countries. Therefore, suppliers are not screened using social criteria (0%).

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-2: Social impacts in the supply chain
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts.

b. Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts.

c. Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain.

d. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment.

e. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

All business partners/suppliers are located in Europe – 0% in high-risk countries.

a. 0 suppliers assessed for social impacts.

b. 0 suppliers were identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts.

c. 0 significant actual and potential negative social impact were identified in the supply chain.

d. 0% of suppliers were identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvement were agreed upon as a result of assessment.

e. 0% of suppliers were identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment.