Key Performance Indicators to criteria 17

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-3: Investment agreements subject to human rights screenings
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening.

b. The definition used for ‘significant investment agreements’.

 Performance indicator of signed Codes of Conduct. Status December 2018:  
Status December 2018  
Full Service Suppliers 83 %
Trade Marketing Suppliers 21 %
Packaging Suppliers 81 %
Limited Edition Suppliers 40 %

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-1: Operations subject to human rights reviews
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments, by country.

No business locations have been reviewed with regard to human rights or human rights implications.

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-1: New suppliers subject to social screening
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria.

We are not yet in a position to make a statement about the percentage of new suppliers that have been reviewed according to social requirements, as the Social Auditing process is still being established.

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-2: Social impacts in the supply chain
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts.

b. Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts.

c. Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain.

d. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment.

e. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

The transparency of our mica supply chain with India as the country of origin is continuously measured and recorded as one of our key performance indicators. All contract manufacturers who use mica in our products must disclose their supply chain. This is mandatory in the sustainability guidelines and the correctness of the data is confirmed by the contract manufacturer's signature. The transparency status of the mica supply chain is reviewed once a year. New mica suppliers are checked for transparency before they supply us for the first time and the mica may only be used in our products after they have been approved.
Status 2017: 18 mica suppliers were reviewed: 61 percent transparency 
Status 2018: 19 mica suppliers were reviewed: 62 percent transparency and/or 88 percent transparency if RMI members are classified as completely transparent.  

In the reporting year 2018, a potential new mica supplier was blocked due to missing and conflicting information regarding his supply chain.

Our goal is to achieve full transparency of the mica supply chain by 2023.