Key Performance Indicators to criteria 17

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-3: Investment agreements subject to human rights screenings
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening.

b. The definition used for ‘significant investment agreements’.

This criterion is not relevant to the environmental campus as a state university, as there are no investment agreements.

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-412-1: Operations subject to human rights reviews
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Total number and percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments, by country.

The environmental campus has only the location in Neubrücke. In addition to guaranteeing all legal requirements, the Environmental Campus has committed itself in its self-commitment to guaranteeing respectful interaction and appreciation towards all university members and furthermore does everything in its power to comply with these standards. The observance of human rights is taken for granted and there are no known violations.

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-1: New suppliers subject to social screening
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria.

As a matter of principle, new suppliers should also be audited according to social criteria. Concrete information on the percentage of suppliers audited cannot be provided at present because no corresponding records are kept.

Key Performance Indicator GRI SRS-414-2: Social impacts in the supply chain
The reporting organization shall report the following information:

a. Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts.

b. Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts.

c. Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain.

d. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment.

e. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

When selecting suppliers, regular attention is paid to social aspects. For example, when procuring cloth bags and fruit bags, the Fairtrade (Cotton) label was chosen. in order to avoid negative social and environmental impacts in the supply chain. Concrete information on the percentage of suppliers audited cannot be provided at present, because no corresponding records are kept. Certification as a "Fair Trade University" is currently being sought and is currently being developed (cmp. 2020 goals in the current german sustainability report).